![]() |
Intel Demos 3.2GHz Nehalem at Shanghai IDF
From our front-page news:
The Intel Developer Forum is the place to be to get sneak-peeks of what Intel has up their sleeves, but that's a given. IDF in Shanghai is taking place right now, and Intel has wasted no time in breaking out the Nehalem and impressive specs.This is one launch I cannot wait for... it seems like such a leap for Intel. They might copy AMD in a lot of regards here, but Intel's processors are faster, and with Intel's extra architecture upgrades, Nehalem is going to be fun to test and read about. |
Oh YEah....Love to see a review of this one.
Oh course I'm CPU poor now....lol Be a while till I do any upgrades. :techgage::techgage: Merlin :techgage::techgage: On vacation 4-13 @ home |
Yeah, its going to be amazing... unfortunately we now know for sure current CPU coolers and CPU waterblocks don't have a snowball's chance in hell of fitting on Nehalem chips. The LGA1366 socket is just way way to massive and has been elongated, so even if the mounting holes were similar the heatspreader is much much larger now.
|
Quote:
I just hope that cooling companies will have plenty of new products available in time for release (and that Intel sends them along guidelines early so that they can make it happen). |
I hope the same, but I am not counting on it. Doubly so with waterblocks, as they need to modify the base of their coolers.
Having almost 2x the heatspreader surface area may be a good thing to mitigate the extra heat (And I am very sure Nehalem will be a hot chip for several specific reasons), but it also means it will take new baseplate designs along with new mounting bracket designs... Could also wonder how many more heatpipes they might use too, since they can squeeze in many more than currently possible now... :eek: INQ released this, check out that industrial strength socket ;) http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...es-nehalem-cpu |
Quote:
You could mod a cooler, but that footprint is huge. Maybe even two cooler on that big boy :techgage::techgage: Merlin :techgage::techgage: |
I might be blind, but from those pictures, the CPU looks to be a similar size to what we see right now. It's just the socket that's increased in size.
|
Actually, someone corrected me on another forum. The Socket 423 Pentium 4 was bigger! Do keep in mind that Nehalem is no longer a square processor, one side has been elongated just slightly. It doesn't show very well in those photos. Intel processors up to thie point were always a square package. :)
This is the size of the processor package, not the socket: LGA 775 = 37.5 x 37.5mm LGA 1366 = 42.5 x 45mm Socket 423 = 53 x 53mm Socket 478 = 35 x 35mm |
I guess this will be one EXPENSIVE CPU
|
Expensive, maybe a little. Hot, definitely yes. Nehalem is 731M transistors... Quad Penryn was ~820M transistors, so total count actually went down. This is because Intel traded 4mb less L2 cache for more useful stuff, like triple channel memory controllers. :)
Silicon size doesn't reflect on the package size, or vice versa. More than likely the die size will be the same as Penryn. Quote:
|
Hot is right... good thing it's starting off with a 45nm process. I still can't wait, though. I think it's going to be one of the most exciting CPU architecture launches in quite a while.
|
I'm on water, a little heat doesn't scare me as long as it's due to blistering performance. :D GT200+Nehalem may strain my watercooling loop though, I was waiting for a new GPU before I bought a GPU block... so I've never really come close to stressing the loop before.
Anyway, SMT made Northwood+Prescott rather hot, and that was to run 1 core with 2 threads. Nehalem will be 4 cores with 8 threads, so I honestly expect Nehalem to be an extremely hot cookie when running 8 threads. From what I've seen each core requires 2-thred SMT transistors, so that would be 4x the SMT logic of Northwood... if true, ya see where I'm going with this! Three memory controllers won't help either. If it lives up to expectations I'll be springing for the expensive LGA1366 version... there are so many disadvantages to the LGA1160 that there may be a very real reason for the "extreme" chip next go around... Not sure if that is a good thing or bad though. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2005 - 2013, Techgage Networks Inc.